CEBL.DE vs. AMEA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE).
CEBL.DE and AMEA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEBL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. It was launched on Aug 6, 2010. AMEA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. Both CEBL.DE and AMEA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEBL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 5.52% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 5.62% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | -15.34% | 1.62% | 15.62% | 22.11% | -12.33% | 25.47% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CEBL.DE having a 5.52% return and AMEA.DE slightly higher at 5.62%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: CEBL.DE at 8.71% and AMEA.DE at 8.71%.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 25.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEBL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CEBL.DE and AMEA.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. AMEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
AMEA.DE
CEBL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBL.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 1.78 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.25 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 7.79 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBL.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.47 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and AMEA.DE is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor AMEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, roughly equal to the maximum AMEA.DE drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and AMEA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -34.43% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.18% | -14.09% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -28.78% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -33.31% | +0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.17% | -8.06% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -11.65% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.35% | -0.01% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) have volatilities of 7.70% and 7.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 7.79% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 13.98% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.28% | 19.78% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 17.72% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 18.76% | -0.06% |