CEBG.DE vs. GLD
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD).
CEBG.DE and GLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEBG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MarketGrader New China ESG. It was launched on Aug 25, 2010. GLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM. It was launched on Nov 18, 2004. Both CEBG.DE and GLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEBG.DE vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEBG.DE vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 10.05% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 33.05% | 5.85% | 26.86% | -10.03% | 15.73% | -10.56% | -0.89% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 12.17% | 44.25% | 35.02% | 9.31% | 5.38% | 3.02% | 14.53% | 20.52% | 2.66% | -1.05% |
Different Trading Currencies
CEBG.DE is traded in EUR, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CEBG.DE having a 10.05% return and GLD slightly higher at 10.30%. Over the past 10 years, CEBG.DE has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 6.02%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 45.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.22%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 22.63%
- 1Y
- 39.68%
- 3Y*
- 30.10%
- 5Y*
- 22.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEBG.DE vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEBG.DE vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.DE
GLD
CEBG.DE vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBG.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 1.55 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 1.99 | +0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.31 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 2.32 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.03 | 8.00 | +5.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBG.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 1.55 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.34 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.93 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.67 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.DE and GLD is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CEBG.DE vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBG.DE nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEBG.DE vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -37.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.DE and GLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.49% | -45.56% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -19.21% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -21.03% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.60% | -22.00% | -27.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -11.71% | +7.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -16.17% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 5.25% | -1.78% |
Volatility
CEBG.DE vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) is 9.38%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that CEBG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 10.37% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 23.27% | -7.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.29% | 25.71% | -3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 16.48% | +4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 14.82% | +9.30% |