CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CEA1.L (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and V3AB.L (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - CEA1.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while V3AB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEA1.L returned 8.95%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for V3AB.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEA1.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for V3AB.L.

Performance

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CEA1.L is traded in GBp, while V3AB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the V3AB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEA1.L achieves a 31.64% return, which is significantly higher than V3AB.L's 12.05% return.

CEA1.L

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 31.64%
• 6M: 33.65%
• 1Y: 54.58%
• 3Y*: 24.42%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

V3AB.L

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 12.05%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: 28.40%
• 3Y*: 18.42%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CEA1.L iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)	31.64%	25.23%	13.67%	0.79%	-11.96%	-4.39%
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	12.05%	12.16%	19.63%	18.07%	-13.32%	17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CEA1.L and V3AB.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021	0.66

The correlation between CEA1.L and V3AB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CEA1.L	V3AB.L
Technology	51.5%	37.5%
Financial Services	13.9%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	10.8%
Communication Services	6.6%	9.4%
Industrials	6.6%	6.1%
Basic Materials	3.2%	3.3%
Healthcare	2.7%	9.3%
Energy	2.4%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	4.0%
Utilities	1.3%	0.4%
Real Estate	0.7%	2.8%

Return for Risk

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEA1.L

CEA1.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
CEA1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CEA1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CEA1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CEA1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CEA1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

V3AB.L

V3AB.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
V3AB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
V3AB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
V3AB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
V3AB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
V3AB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEA1.L	V3AB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	2.32	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.23	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.45	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	3.58	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.27	14.17	+1.10

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEA1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the V3AB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEA1.L and V3AB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEA1.L drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than V3AB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEA1.L and V3AB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEA1.L	V3AB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.40%	-19.04%	-79.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.68%	-7.90%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.44%	-19.04%	-5.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.87%	-19.04%	-9.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-1.51%	-2.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.20%	-4.76%	-6.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	2.00%	+1.56%

Volatility

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) at 4.26%. This indicates that CEA1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3AB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEA1.L	V3AB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	4.26%	+5.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.94%	9.48%	+8.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.26%	12.17%	+8.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.82%	13.80%	+9.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.01%	13.68%	+7.33%

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEA1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than V3AB.L's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CEA1.L vs. V3AB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEA1.L nor V3AB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEA1.L and V3AB.L in my portfolio?

CEA1.L and V3AB.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CEA1.L or V3AB.L?

On fees, CEA1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEA1.L or V3AB.L?

CEA1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for V3AB.L.

What is the main difference between CEA1.L and V3AB.L?

CEA1.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while V3AB.L is Global Equities. CEA1.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while V3AB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEA1.L and 0.24% for V3AB.L.