CEA1.L vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
CEA1.L and SPY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEA1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Aug 6, 2010. SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993. Both CEA1.L and SPY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEA1.L or SPY.
Correlation
The correlation between CEA1.L and SPY is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CEA1.L vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CEA1.L:
0.21
SPY:
0.54
CEA1.L:
0.40
SPY:
0.90
CEA1.L:
1.05
SPY:
1.13
CEA1.L:
0.15
SPY:
0.57
CEA1.L:
0.64
SPY:
2.24
CEA1.L:
5.70%
SPY:
4.82%
CEA1.L:
17.49%
SPY:
20.02%
CEA1.L:
-33.94%
SPY:
-55.19%
CEA1.L:
-14.74%
SPY:
-7.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEA1.L achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -3.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CEA1.L has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 5.43%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.
CEA1.L
-0.82%
8.30%
-4.46%
3.74%
4.98%
5.43%
SPY
-3.30%
13.81%
-4.52%
10.65%
15.81%
12.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEA1.L vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEA1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEA1.L vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CEA1.L
SPY
CEA1.L vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEA1.L vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CEA1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEA1.L iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% |
SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.27% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
CEA1.L vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEA1.L drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEA1.L and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEA1.L vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) is 7.21%, while SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 12.36%. This indicates that CEA1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.