CEA1.L vs. XCX5.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L).
CEA1.L and XCX5.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEA1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Aug 6, 2010. XCX5.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2010. Both CEA1.L and XCX5.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEA1.L or XCX5.L.
Correlation
The correlation between CEA1.L and XCX5.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CEA1.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CEA1.L:
0.21
XCX5.L:
-0.32
CEA1.L:
0.40
XCX5.L:
-0.20
CEA1.L:
1.05
XCX5.L:
0.97
CEA1.L:
0.15
XCX5.L:
-0.21
CEA1.L:
0.64
XCX5.L:
-0.48
CEA1.L:
5.70%
XCX5.L:
8.30%
CEA1.L:
17.49%
XCX5.L:
17.09%
CEA1.L:
-33.94%
XCX5.L:
-41.74%
CEA1.L:
-14.74%
XCX5.L:
-14.23%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEA1.L achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CEA1.L has underperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 5.43%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.65% annualized return.
CEA1.L
-0.82%
8.30%
-4.46%
3.74%
4.98%
5.43%
XCX5.L
-8.01%
0.60%
-8.10%
-5.50%
15.74%
8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEA1.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEA1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEA1.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CEA1.L
XCX5.L
CEA1.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEA1.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEA1.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEA1.L iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEA1.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEA1.L drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum XCX5.L drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEA1.L and XCX5.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEA1.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) at 7.42%. This indicates that CEA1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.