CEA1.L vs. EMV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EMV.L).
CEA1.L and EMV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEA1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Aug 6, 2010. EMV.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. Both CEA1.L and EMV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEA1.L or EMV.L.
Correlation
The correlation between CEA1.L and EMV.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CEA1.L vs. EMV.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CEA1.L:
0.21
EMV.L:
0.37
CEA1.L:
0.40
EMV.L:
0.59
CEA1.L:
1.05
EMV.L:
1.08
CEA1.L:
0.15
EMV.L:
0.34
CEA1.L:
0.64
EMV.L:
1.23
CEA1.L:
5.70%
EMV.L:
3.08%
CEA1.L:
17.49%
EMV.L:
9.95%
CEA1.L:
-33.94%
EMV.L:
-28.68%
CEA1.L:
-14.74%
EMV.L:
-4.61%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEA1.L achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than EMV.L's -2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CEA1.L has outperformed EMV.L with an annualized return of 5.43%, while EMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.85% annualized return.
CEA1.L
-0.82%
8.30%
-4.46%
3.74%
4.98%
5.43%
EMV.L
-2.05%
5.02%
-2.10%
3.72%
4.93%
3.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEA1.L vs. EMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEA1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMV.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEA1.L vs. EMV.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CEA1.L
EMV.L
CEA1.L vs. EMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEA1.L vs. EMV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEA1.L nor EMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEA1.L iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% |
EMV.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEA1.L vs. EMV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEA1.L drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than EMV.L's maximum drawdown of -28.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEA1.L and EMV.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEA1.L vs. EMV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EMV.L) at 6.29%. This indicates that CEA1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.