CEA1.L vs. IPAC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC).
CEA1.L and IPAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEA1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Aug 6, 2010. IPAC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both CEA1.L and IPAC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEA1.L or IPAC.
Correlation
The correlation between CEA1.L and IPAC is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CEA1.L vs. IPAC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CEA1.L:
0.21
IPAC:
0.50
CEA1.L:
0.40
IPAC:
0.71
CEA1.L:
1.05
IPAC:
1.10
CEA1.L:
0.15
IPAC:
0.51
CEA1.L:
0.64
IPAC:
1.61
CEA1.L:
5.70%
IPAC:
4.90%
CEA1.L:
17.49%
IPAC:
19.38%
CEA1.L:
-33.94%
IPAC:
-30.99%
CEA1.L:
-14.74%
IPAC:
-0.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEA1.L achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than IPAC's 6.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CEA1.L having a 5.43% annualized return and IPAC not far behind at 5.23%.
CEA1.L
-0.82%
8.30%
-4.46%
3.74%
4.98%
5.43%
IPAC
6.92%
16.95%
3.16%
9.57%
8.86%
5.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEA1.L vs. IPAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEA1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IPAC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEA1.L vs. IPAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CEA1.L
IPAC
CEA1.L vs. IPAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEA1.L vs. IPAC - Dividend Comparison
CEA1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEA1.L iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% |
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 3.20% | 3.43% | 3.16% | 2.76% | 4.03% | 1.68% | 3.37% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 2.66% | 2.60% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
CEA1.L vs. IPAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEA1.L drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than IPAC's maximum drawdown of -30.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEA1.L and IPAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEA1.L vs. IPAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) is 7.21%, while iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has a volatility of 9.16%. This indicates that CEA1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.