CEA1.L vs. PADV.L
CEA1.L (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and PADV.L (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CEA1.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD while PADV.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEA1.L returned 12.09%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for PADV.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEA1.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PADV.L.
Performance
CEA1.L vs. PADV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEA1.L is traded in GBp, while PADV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PADV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEA1.L achieves a 30.56% return, which is significantly higher than PADV.L's 3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CEA1.L has outperformed PADV.L with an annualized return of 12.09%, while PADV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.74% annualized return.
CEA1.L
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 8.28%
- YTD
- 30.56%
- 6M
- 33.05%
- 1Y
- 59.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
PADV.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 13.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
CEA1.L vs. PADV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEA1.L iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 30.56% | 25.23% | 13.67% | 0.79% | -11.96% | -4.22% | 23.90% | 13.81% | -10.88% | 29.65% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 3.65% | 14.61% | 6.60% | 9.29% | -5.74% | 3.20% | -2.54% | 16.77% | -3.74% | 18.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEA1.L and PADV.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CEA1.L and PADV.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CEA1.L vs. PADV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Financial Services
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Consumer Cyclical
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Industrials
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Communication Services
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Basic Materials
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Healthcare
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Energy
CEA1.L
PADV.L
-
Consumer Defensive
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Utilities
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Real Estate
CEA1.L
PADV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEA1.L vs. PADV.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEA1.L
PADV.L
CEA1.L vs. PADV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEA1.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.21 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.09 | 1.87 | +3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.73 | 4.60 | +13.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEA1.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23 | 1.17 | +2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.41 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.56 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
CEA1.L vs. PADV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEA1.L drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than PADV.L's maximum drawdown of -27.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEA1.L and PADV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEA1.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -27.09% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -7.01% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.35% | -10.60% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.87% | -20.25% | -8.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.94% | -24.94% | -9.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -4.84% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -5.65% | -5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.87% | +0.49% |
Volatility
CEA1.L vs. PADV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that CEA1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEA1.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 2.49% | +5.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.73% | 8.83% | +6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 11.24% | +7.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 13.03% | +4.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 14.63% | +3.90% |
CEA1.L vs. PADV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEA1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PADV.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEA1.L vs. PADV.L - Dividend Comparison
CEA1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PADV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEA1.L iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 2.89% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 2.93% | 3.44% | 2.91% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 2.14% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEA1.L and PADV.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEA1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEA1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PADV.L.
CEA1.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while PADV.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEA1.L and 0.55% for PADV.L.
Find the right allocation for CEA1.L and PADV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer