PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CEA1.L vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CEA1.L vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CEA1.L (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CEA1.L returned 11.80%/yr vs 67.79%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CEA1.L vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CEA1.L is traded in GBp, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEA1.L achieves a 31.64% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 7.28% return. Over the past 10 years, CEA1.L has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 11.80%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.79% annualized return.

CEA1.L

1D
0.83%
1M
2.85%
YTD
31.64%
6M
33.65%
1Y
54.58%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
11.80%

NVDA

1D
-1.85%
1M
-7.07%
YTD
7.28%
6M
6.34%
1Y
31.47%
3Y*
66.90%
5Y*
61.11%
10Y*
67.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEA1.L vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEA1.L
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)		31.64%25.23%13.67%0.79%-11.96%-4.22%23.90%13.81%-10.88%29.65%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		7.28%29.02%175.99%222.07%-44.35%127.62%115.77%70.21%-26.71%66.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CEA1.L and NVDA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2010

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)

NVIDIA Corporation

Often compared with CEA1.L:
CEA1.L vs. ADIVCEA1.L vs. EMV.LCEA1.L vs. XCX5.LCEA1.L vs. EMIM.LCEA1.L vs. IPACCEA1.L vs. IWDA.LCEA1.L vs. SPY
Often compared with NVDA:
NVDA vs. AMDNVDA vs. AAPLNVDA vs. AVGONVDA vs. TSMNVDA vs. SPYNVDA vs. AMZNNVDA vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

CEA1.L vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CEA1.L
CEA1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CEA1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEA1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEA1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CEA1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEA1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEA1.L vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CEA1.LNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.68
0.89

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.36
1.41

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.17

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

1.55

+3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.27

3.24

+12.03

CEA1.L vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEA1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEA1.L and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEA1.L vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEA1.L drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -79.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEA1.L and NVDA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CEA1.LNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.40%

-79.51%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.68%

-20.42%

+8.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.44%

-39.34%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.87%

-59.90%

+31.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.94%

-59.90%

+25.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-15.58%

+11.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.20%

-28.44%

+17.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

9.73%

-6.17%

Volatility

CEA1.L vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEA1.L) is 10.05%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that CEA1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CEA1.LNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.05%

12.90%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

26.02%

-8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.26%

35.58%

-15.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

50.67%

-27.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

49.49%

-28.48%

Dividends

CEA1.L vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

CEA1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEA1.L
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

CEA1.L and NVDA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEA1.L and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer