CDW vs. ROM
CDW (CDW Corporation) is a stock, while ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, CDW returned 13.48%/yr vs 38.51%/yr for ROM. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CDW vs. ROM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDW achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 54.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CDW has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 13.48%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 38.51% annualized return.
CDW
- 1D
- -9.03%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- -13.58%
- 3Y*
- -9.58%
- 5Y*
- -4.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.43%
ROM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 68.85%
- YTD
- 54.22%
- 1Y
- 82.51%
- 3Y*
- 50.06%
- 5Y*
- 22.37%
- 10Y*
- 38.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $295.54M | $288.70M | $276.48M | |
| $9.10M | $7.79M | $10.49M |
CDW vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDW CDW Corporation | 4.00% | -20.56% | -22.57% | 28.84% | -11.75% | 56.87% | -6.55% | 78.22% | 17.98% | 34.92% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 54.22% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDW and ROM is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CDW and ROM has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDW vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank
CDW
ROM
CDW vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CDW Corporation (CDW) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDW | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.26 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 2.57 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 6.41 | -7.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDW vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDW drawdown since its inception was -60.37%, smaller than the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDW and ROM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDW | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.37% | -83.36% | +22.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.30% | -32.33% | -8.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.37% | -48.10% | -12.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.37% | -67.55% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.37% | -67.55% | +7.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.75% | -14.97% | -28.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -20.84% | +9.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.49% | 12.92% | +7.57% |
Volatility
CDW vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CDW Corporation (CDW) is 15.64%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 19.98%. This indicates that CDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDW | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.64% | 19.98% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.39% | 44.30% | -4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.52% | 51.92% | -8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.98% | 53.46% | -21.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.41% | 50.67% | -19.26% |
Dividends
CDW vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison
CDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than ROM's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDW CDW Corporation | 1.80% | 1.84% | 1.43% | 1.05% | 1.17% | 0.83% | 1.17% | 0.89% | 1.14% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 0.74% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.06% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDW and ROM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROM has higher volatility (19.98%) compared to CDW (15.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDW dropped -60.37% vs ROM's -83.36%.
ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDW and ROM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer