HIW vs. GOOD
Compare and contrast key facts about Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD).
Performance
HIW vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HIW vs. GOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. | -15.21% | -9.61% | 43.11% | -10.14% | -33.58% | 17.63% | -14.76% | 31.82% | -20.84% | 3.36% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 11.18% | -28.11% | 33.25% | -21.63% | -22.52% | 53.53% | -9.58% | 30.74% | -7.82% | 12.41% |
Fundamentals
HIW:
$2.35B
GOOD:
$545.82M
HIW:
$1.45
GOOD:
$0.41
HIW:
14.78
GOOD:
28.09
HIW:
2.93
GOOD:
3.36
HIW:
$806.11M
GOOD:
$161.34M
HIW:
$544.74M
GOOD:
$0.00
HIW:
$610.04M
GOOD:
$58.25M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIW achieves a -15.21% return, which is significantly lower than GOOD's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, HIW has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of -2.36%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 4.79% annualized return.
HIW
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -15.21%
- 6M
- -30.52%
- 1Y
- -21.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- -7.32%
- 10Y*
- -2.36%
GOOD
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIW vs. GOOD — Risk / Return Rank
HIW
GOOD
HIW vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIW | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | -0.69 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | -0.86 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.90 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.58 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | -1.02 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIW | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | -0.69 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | -0.11 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | 0.15 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.21 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between HIW and GOOD is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HIW vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison
HIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, less than GOOD's 10.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. | 9.34% | 7.75% | 6.54% | 8.71% | 7.15% | 4.40% | 4.84% | 3.88% | 4.78% | 3.46% | 4.90% | 3.90% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 10.38% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
Drawdowns
HIW vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIW drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, smaller than the maximum GOOD drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIW and GOOD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIW | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -67.22% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.03% | -26.07% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.40% | -53.30% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.93% | -66.25% | +7.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.42% | -35.32% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -13.30% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.55% | 14.74% | -0.19% |
Volatility
HIW vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison
Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) at 6.85%. This indicates that HIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HIW | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.15% | 6.85% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.91% | 16.76% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.70% | 22.42% | +5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.95% | 24.86% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.36% | 32.11% | -1.75% |
Financials
HIW vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Highwoods Properties, Inc. and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities