PortfoliosLab logo
HIW vs. GOOD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HIW and GOOD is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HIW vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HIW:

0.80

GOOD:

0.22

Sortino Ratio

HIW:

1.33

GOOD:

0.54

Omega Ratio

HIW:

1.16

GOOD:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

HIW:

0.60

GOOD:

0.17

Martin Ratio

HIW:

1.87

GOOD:

0.69

Ulcer Index

HIW:

12.46%

GOOD:

8.34%

Daily Std Dev

HIW:

26.75%

GOOD:

20.84%

Max Drawdown

HIW:

-63.48%

GOOD:

-67.22%

Current Drawdown

HIW:

-20.02%

GOOD:

-27.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HIW:

$3.34B

GOOD:

$658.75M

EPS

HIW:

$1.60

GOOD:

$0.27

PE Ratio

HIW:

19.01

GOOD:

52.81

PEG Ratio

HIW:

5.09

GOOD:

-62.67

PS Ratio

HIW:

4.08

GOOD:

4.41

PB Ratio

HIW:

1.36

GOOD:

3.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

HIW:

$816.59M

GOOD:

$151.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HIW:

$474.73M

GOOD:

$73.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

HIW:

$516.12M

GOOD:

$96.19M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIW achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than GOOD's -9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, HIW has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of 1.92%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.06% annualized return.


HIW

YTD

1.18%

1M

15.15%

6M

-5.28%

1Y

21.08%

5Y*

5.61%

10Y*

1.92%

GOOD

YTD

-9.86%

1M

6.94%

6M

-14.05%

1Y

4.50%

5Y*

8.50%

10Y*

6.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HIW vs. GOOD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HIW is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HIW is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HIW is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HIW is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HIW is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HIW is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOOD is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HIW vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HIW Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the GOOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIW and GOOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HIW vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison

HIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, less than GOOD's 8.42% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HIW
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
6.58%6.54%8.71%7.15%4.40%4.84%3.88%4.79%3.46%4.90%3.90%3.84%
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
8.42%7.39%9.06%8.13%5.83%8.34%6.86%8.37%7.12%7.46%10.28%8.74%

Drawdowns

HIW vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIW drawdown since its inception was -63.48%, smaller than the maximum GOOD drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIW and GOOD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HIW vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison

Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) at 4.62%. This indicates that HIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HIW vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Highwoods Properties, Inc. and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
200.38M
37.50M
(HIW) Total Revenue
(GOOD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items