CDL vs. YCS
CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - CDL is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CDL returned 11.17%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for YCS. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CDL charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
CDL vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CDL has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 11.17%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.
CDL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.29%
YCS
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 25.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.48K | $625.50K | $553.90K | |
| $1.53M | $2.43M | $1.42M |
CDL vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 17.17% | 9.04% | 15.58% | 3.03% | -0.45% | 33.42% | -3.35% | 26.38% | -5.86% | 16.29% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.29% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDL and YCS is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015 | 0.09 |
The correlation between CDL and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDL vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
CDL
YCS
CDL vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDL | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 2.35 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 8.93 | +4.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDL vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDL | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.03% | -49.56% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.66% | -8.30% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.87% | -23.05% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.28% | -27.32% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.03% | -27.32% | -13.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -5.68% | +3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -19.75% | +15.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.64% | -1.05% |
Volatility
CDL vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) is 4.20%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that CDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDL | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 5.30% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 11.65% | -3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 16.85% | -6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 21.16% | -7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 18.61% | -1.57% |
CDL vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDL vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.06% | 3.33% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 3.31% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 2.87% | 2.97% | 1.28% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDL and YCS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to CDL (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.76% vs 11.17% for CDL. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
CDL is categorized as Dividend, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Crestview and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 1.00% for YCS.
CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDL and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer