PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDL vs. SPDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDL vs. SPDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly higher than SPDG's 14.23% return.


CDL

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.29%
6M
10.38%
YTD
17.17%
1Y
22.30%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
11.17%
ALL TIME*
11.29%

SPDG

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.77%
6M
7.57%
YTD
14.23%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$504.48K$625.50K$553.90K
$48.48K$40.82K$36.86K

CDL vs. SPDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
17.17%9.04%15.58%5.29%
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
14.23%11.66%20.22%8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and SPDG is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023

0.74

The correlation between CDL and SPDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDL vs. SPDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDL
SPDG

Utilities

24.3%
2.6%

Financial Services

24.1%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

15.7%
5.4%

Energy

8.6%
4.1%

Healthcare

7.2%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
9.6%

Technology

6.9%
32.4%

Communication Services

3.9%
8.6%

Industrials

2.3%
9.0%

Basic Materials

0.0%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.4%

Utilities

CDL
24.3%
SPDG
2.6%

Financial Services

CDL
24.1%
SPDG
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

CDL
15.7%
SPDG
5.4%

Energy

CDL
8.6%
SPDG
4.1%

Healthcare

CDL
7.2%
SPDG
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CDL
7.0%
SPDG
9.6%

Technology

CDL
6.9%
SPDG
32.4%

Communication Services

CDL
3.9%
SPDG
8.6%

Industrials

CDL
2.3%
SPDG
9.0%

Basic Materials

CDL
0.0%
SPDG
2.2%

Real Estate

CDL
0.0%
SPDG
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDL vs. SPDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDG
SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDL vs. SPDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDLSPDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

2.83

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

9.27

+4.50

CDL vs. SPDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the SPDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and SPDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDL vs. SPDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, which is greater than SPDG's maximum drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and SPDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDLSPDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-15.67%

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-8.34%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-2.77%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-2.19%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.54%

-0.95%

Volatility

CDL vs. SPDG - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) at 3.50%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDLSPDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.50%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

9.56%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

12.55%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

14.11%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

14.11%

+2.93%

CDL vs. SPDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDG's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDL vs. SPDG - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than SPDG's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.06%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.72%2.87%2.61%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDL and SPDG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDL has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SPDG (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs SPDG's -15.67%.

On 1-year performance, SPDG leads with 24.51% vs 22.30% for CDL. On fees, SPDG is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPDG has performed better with a 24.51% return vs 22.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDG is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CDL.

CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.72% for SPDG.

CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while SPDG tracks S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.05% for SPDG.

CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDL and SPDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer