CDL vs. ROE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CDL is passively managed, while ROE is actively managed. Over the past year, CDL returned 20.88% vs 35.20% for ROE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.

Performance

CDL vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 19.29% return.

CDL

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 13.80%
• 6M: 13.70%
• 1Y: 20.88%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: 11.31%

ROE

• 1D: -2.17%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 19.29%
• 6M: 17.72%
• 1Y: 35.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDL vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	13.80%	9.04%	15.58%	1.41%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	19.29%	17.20%	18.34%	4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and ROE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between CDL and ROE has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CDL vs. ROE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CDL	ROE
Utilities	23.7%	2.0%
Financial Services	23.1%	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	15.8%	4.3%
Energy	9.0%	3.3%
Technology	8.0%	40.3%
Healthcare	6.9%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	8.9%
Communication Services	4.4%	10.4%
Industrials	2.2%	8.7%
Basic Materials	0.0%	1.7%
Real Estate	0.0%	1.8%

Return for Risk

CDL vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDL

CDL Risk / Return Rank: 71
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 74

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 81
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDL vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDL	ROE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.39	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.17	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.42	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	4.09	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	17.99	-4.91

CDL vs. ROE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ROE Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and ROE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CDL vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, which is greater than ROE's maximum drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and ROE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDL	ROE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.03%	-19.10%	-21.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-8.66%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-2.17%	+1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-2.57%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.96%	-0.36%

Volatility

CDL vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) is 3.47%, while Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that CDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDL	ROE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	6.40%	-2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.14%	11.76%	-4.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.98%	14.84%	-4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.85%	15.99%	-2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	15.99%	+1.05%

CDL vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDL vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than ROE's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	3.13%	3.33%	3.27%	3.61%	3.31%	2.60%	3.32%	3.04%	3.32%	2.87%	2.97%	1.28%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	0.95%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDL and ROE in my portfolio?

CDL and ROE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDL or ROE?

ROE has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to CDL (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs ROE's -19.10%.

Which ETF is better, CDL or ROE?

On 1-year performance, ROE leads with 35.20% vs 20.88% for CDL. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CDL or ROE?

Over the 1-year period, ROE has performed better with a 35.20% return vs 20.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDL or ROE?

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CDL or ROE?

CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.95% for ROE.

What is the main difference between CDL and ROE?

They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.49% for ROE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.