CDEI vs. PSCX
CDEI (Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CDEI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while PSCX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. CDEI is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDEI returned 19.13%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CDEI charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
CDEI vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDEI achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 6.48% return.
CDEI
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.30%
PSCX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $670.28K | $332.00K | $158.81K | |
| $28.65K | $20.26K | $39.23K |
CDEI vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF | 12.39% | 16.60% | 18.67% | 22.82% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 6.48% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 12.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDEI and PSCX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between CDEI and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
CDEI vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDEI
PSCX
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
CDEI
PSCX
Financial Services
CDEI
PSCX
Healthcare
CDEI
PSCX
Communication Services
CDEI
PSCX
Industrials
CDEI
PSCX
Consumer Defensive
CDEI
PSCX
Consumer Cyclical
CDEI
PSCX
Real Estate
CDEI
PSCX
Utilities
CDEI
PSCX
Energy
CDEI
PSCX
Basic Materials
CDEI
PSCX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDEI vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
CDEI
PSCX
CDEI vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDEI | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 3.27 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 16.27 | -5.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDEI vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDEI | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.46% | -10.20% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.88% | -4.20% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.46% | -9.61% | -9.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -1.82% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 0.84% | +1.48% |
Volatility
CDEI vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 1.60%. This indicates that CDEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDEI | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 1.60% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 4.64% | +5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 5.71% | +7.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 7.14% | +7.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 6.94% | +8.13% |
CDEI vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDEI vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF | 0.97% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 1.16% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDEI and PSCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDEI has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to PSCX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs PSCX's -10.20%.
On 3-year performance, CDEI leads with 19.13% vs 12.41% for PSCX. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CDEI has performed better with a 19.13% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
CDEI has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
CDEI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSCX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.75% for PSCX.
PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDEI and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer