CDE vs. K.TO
CDE (Coeur Mining, Inc.) and K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, CDE returned 7.09%/yr vs 18.69%/yr for K.TO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CDE vs. K.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CDE is traded in USD, while K.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the K.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDE achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly higher than K.TO's -9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CDE has underperformed K.TO with an annualized return of 7.09%, while K.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.69% annualized return.
CDE
- 1D
- 4.88%
- 1M
- -11.24%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 85.95%
- 3Y*
- 74.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
K.TO
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -17.18%
- YTD
- -9.10%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- 63.05%
- 3Y*
- 76.47%
- 5Y*
- 28.81%
- 10Y*
- 18.69%
CDE vs. K.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | -3.43% | 211.71% | 75.46% | -2.98% | -33.33% | -51.30% | 28.09% | 80.76% | -40.40% | -17.49% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -9.10% | 205.76% | 55.88% | 52.77% | -27.35% | -20.20% | 56.50% | 46.02% | -25.12% | 38.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDE and K.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CDE and K.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CDE:
$1.64
K.TO:
$2.36
CDE:
10.46
K.TO:
10.83
CDE:
0.09
K.TO:
0.14
CDE:
3.26
K.TO:
3.90
CDE:
$2.57B
K.TO:
$7.97B
CDE:
$909.07M
K.TO:
$4.26B
CDE:
$1.23B
K.TO:
$5.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDE vs. K.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CDE
K.TO
CDE vs. K.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDE | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.77 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.02 | 5.33 | -1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDE vs. K.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDE drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than K.TO's maximum drawdown of -94.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDE and K.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDE | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -94.64% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.18% | -37.51% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.18% | -37.51% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.84% | -59.49% | -21.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.42% | -68.23% | -19.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.03% | -32.36% | -61.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.49% | -61.04% | -20.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.71% | 12.45% | +9.26% |
Volatility
CDE vs. K.TO - Volatility Comparison
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) has a higher volatility of 22.43% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) at 18.27%. This indicates that CDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than K.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDE | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.43% | 18.27% | +4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.24% | 39.44% | +15.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.98% | 51.25% | +19.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.37% | 42.93% | +25.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.85% | 45.97% | +22.88% |
Dividends
CDE vs. K.TO - Dividend Comparison
CDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than K.TO's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.56% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 0.85% |
Financials
CDE vs. K.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coeur Mining, Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CDE vs. K.TO - Profitability Comparison
CDE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 856.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
K.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
CDE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported an operating income of 349.17M and revenue of 856.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.8%.
K.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
CDE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coeur Mining, Inc. reported a net income of 246.76M and revenue of 856.19M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.
K.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CDE and K.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CDE and K.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer