CDC vs. SPMV
CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) and SPMV (Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CDC is a Low Volatility fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while SPMV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CDC charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for SPMV.
Performance
CDC vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CDC
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.04%
SPMV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.04M | $983.49K | $1.23M |
CDC vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 18.09% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -4.99% | -7.86% | 33.05% | 12.88% | 19.64% | -5.97% | 8.27% |
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | 0.87% | 11.69% | 18.78% | 10.28% | -10.84% | 24.35% | 8.57% | 32.13% | -6.28% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDC and SPMV is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CDC and SPMV has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CDC vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDC
SPMV
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
CDC
SPMV
Financial Services
CDC
SPMV
Consumer Defensive
CDC
SPMV
Energy
CDC
SPMV
Healthcare
CDC
SPMV
Consumer Cyclical
CDC
SPMV
Technology
CDC
SPMV
Communication Services
CDC
SPMV
Industrials
CDC
SPMV
Basic Materials
CDC
SPMV
Real Estate
CDC
SPMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDC vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank
CDC
SPMV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CDC vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDC | SPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.68 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDC vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDC | SPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | — | — |
Volatility
CDC vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDC | SPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.56% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.22% | — | — |
CDC vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDC vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison
CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.05% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | 1.05% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 3.13% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDC and SPMV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.
CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.
CDC is categorized as Low Volatility, while SPMV is S&P 500. CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.10% for SPMV.
Find the right allocation for CDC and SPMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer