PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDC vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDC vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CDC

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.50%
6M
8.57%
YTD
18.09%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
10.34%
ALL TIME*
10.04%

SPMV

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.04M$983.49K$1.23M

CDC vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
18.09%8.96%14.48%-4.99%-7.86%33.05%12.88%19.64%-5.97%8.27%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CDC and SPMV is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between CDC and SPMV has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CDC vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDC
SPMV

Utilities

24.3%
2.8%

Financial Services

24.1%
17.8%

Consumer Defensive

15.7%
10.7%

Energy

8.6%
4.8%

Healthcare

7.2%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
6.6%

Technology

6.9%
26.9%

Communication Services

3.9%
6.5%

Industrials

2.3%
6.0%

Basic Materials

0.6%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.2%

Utilities

CDC
24.3%
SPMV
2.8%

Financial Services

CDC
24.1%
SPMV
17.8%

Consumer Defensive

CDC
15.7%
SPMV
10.7%

Energy

CDC
8.6%
SPMV
4.8%

Healthcare

CDC
7.2%
SPMV
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CDC
7.0%
SPMV
6.6%

Technology

CDC
6.9%
SPMV
26.9%

Communication Services

CDC
3.9%
SPMV
6.5%

Industrials

CDC
2.3%
SPMV
6.0%

Basic Materials

CDC
0.6%
SPMV
2.6%

Real Estate

CDC
0.0%
SPMV
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDC vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDC
CDC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDC vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDCSPMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

CDC vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDC vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDCSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

Volatility

CDC vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDCSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

CDC vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDC vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
3.05%3.36%3.32%4.24%3.48%2.65%2.48%3.04%3.37%2.81%2.99%3.17%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.05%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDC and SPMV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.

CDC is categorized as Low Volatility, while SPMV is S&P 500. CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.10% for SPMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDC and SPMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer