PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDC vs. MDLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDC vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CDC having a 10.57% return and MDLV slightly lower at 10.21%.


CDC

1D
-0.57%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
10.57%
6M
10.29%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
10.03%

MDLV

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.67%
YTD
10.21%
6M
11.06%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
12.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDC vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
10.57%8.96%14.48%-3.21%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
10.21%13.30%10.16%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CDC and MDLV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023

0.86

The correlation between CDC and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDC vs. MDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDC
MDLV

Utilities

24.3%
15.2%

Financial Services

23.4%
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

15.9%
8.2%

Energy

9.5%
14.4%

Technology

6.9%
9.3%

Healthcare

6.8%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
3.9%

Communication Services

4.4%
6.4%

Industrials

2.3%
15.0%

Basic Materials

0.0%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.2%

Utilities

CDC
24.3%
MDLV
15.2%

Financial Services

CDC
23.4%
MDLV
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

CDC
15.9%
MDLV
8.2%

Energy

CDC
9.5%
MDLV
14.4%

Technology

CDC
6.9%
MDLV
9.3%

Healthcare

CDC
6.8%
MDLV
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CDC
6.6%
MDLV
3.9%

Communication Services

CDC
4.4%
MDLV
6.4%

Industrials

CDC
2.3%
MDLV
15.0%

Basic Materials

CDC
0.0%
MDLV
2.6%

Real Estate

CDC
0.0%
MDLV
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDC vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDC
CDC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLV
MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDC vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDCMDLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

4.70

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

14.78

-3.41

CDC vs. MDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the MDLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDC and MDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDCMDLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.29

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.06

-0.31

Drawdowns

CDC vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and MDLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDCMDLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.37%

-10.71%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-4.27%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-10.71%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-1.08%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-2.29%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.36%

+0.24%

Volatility

CDC vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDCMDLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.77%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

6.57%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

8.76%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.54%

10.52%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

10.52%

+2.69%

CDC vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDC vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison

CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than MDLV's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
3.18%3.36%3.32%4.24%3.48%2.65%2.48%3.04%3.37%2.81%2.99%3.17%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
2.80%3.00%2.78%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDC and MDLV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDLV has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to CDC (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs MDLV's -10.71%.

On 3-year performance, MDLV leads with 12.68% vs 11.97% for CDC. On fees, CDC is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, CDC has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MDLV has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDC is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.80% for MDLV.

They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.58% for MDLV.

MDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDC and MDLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer