CDC vs. MDLV
CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) and MDLV (Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CDC is passively managed, while MDLV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDC returned 12.32%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for MDLV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CDC charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for MDLV.
Performance
CDC vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than MDLV's 10.95% return.
CDC
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
MDLV
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDC vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 11.64% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -3.21% |
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF | 10.95% | 13.30% | 10.16% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDC and MDLV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CDC and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
CDC vs. MDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDC
MDLV
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
CDC
MDLV
Financial Services
CDC
MDLV
Consumer Defensive
CDC
MDLV
Energy
CDC
MDLV
Technology
CDC
MDLV
Healthcare
CDC
MDLV
Consumer Cyclical
CDC
MDLV
Communication Services
CDC
MDLV
Industrials
CDC
MDLV
Basic Materials
CDC
MDLV
Real Estate
CDC
MDLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDC vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank
CDC
MDLV
CDC vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDC | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 5.01 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 15.75 | -3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDC | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.44 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.08 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
CDC vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and MDLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDC | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | -10.71% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -4.27% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -10.71% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -0.42% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -2.29% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.36% | +0.24% |
Volatility
CDC vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDC | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 2.83% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.87% | 6.58% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.81% | 8.77% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 10.51% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 10.51% | +2.70% |
CDC vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDC vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison
CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than MDLV's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.15% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF | 2.78% | 3.00% | 2.78% | 2.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDC and MDLV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDLV has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to CDC (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs MDLV's -10.71%.
On 3-year performance, MDLV leads with 13.07% vs 12.32% for CDC. On fees, CDC is cheaper at 0.37% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MDLV has performed better with a 13.07% return vs 12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDC is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.
CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.78% for MDLV.
They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.58% for MDLV.
MDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDC and MDLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer