CDC vs. IAG
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG).
CDC is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014.
Performance
CDC vs. IAG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CDC vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 9.03% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -4.99% | -7.86% | 33.05% | 12.88% | 19.64% | -5.97% | 15.77% |
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | 14.13% | 219.57% | 103.95% | -1.94% | -17.57% | -14.71% | -1.61% | 1.36% | -36.88% | 51.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's 14.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CDC has underperformed IAG with an annualized return of 10.00%, while IAG has yielded a comparatively higher 23.61% annualized return.
CDC
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
IAG
- 1D
- 7.54%
- 1M
- -23.40%
- YTD
- 14.13%
- 6M
- 45.55%
- 1Y
- 201.12%
- 3Y*
- 90.79%
- 5Y*
- 43.07%
- 10Y*
- 23.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDC vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank
CDC
IAG
CDC vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDC | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 3.23 | -2.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 3.12 | -1.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.43 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 5.76 | -4.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 17.44 | -12.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDC | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 3.23 | -2.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.72 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.40 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.12 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between CDC and IAG is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CDC vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison
CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, while IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.19% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CDC vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, smaller than the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and IAG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDC | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | -95.55% | +74.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -34.60% | +23.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | -74.52% | +53.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.37% | -86.46% | +65.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -23.40% | +20.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -56.44% | +51.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 11.42% | -8.58% |
Volatility
CDC vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) is 2.97%, while IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a volatility of 20.42%. This indicates that CDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CDC | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 20.42% | -17.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 48.69% | -41.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.63% | 62.70% | -49.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 59.89% | -47.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 59.14% | -45.92% |