CCWSX vs. BIMSX
CCWSX (Chautauqua International Growth Fund) and BIMSX (Baird Intermediate Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - CCWSX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Baird, while BIMSX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Baird. Over the past 5 years, CCWSX returned 3.15%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for BIMSX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCWSX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BIMSX.
Performance
CCWSX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCWSX achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than BIMSX's 0.09% return.
CCWSX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
BIMSX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
CCWSX vs. BIMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCWSX Chautauqua International Growth Fund | -5.54% | 19.17% | 11.30% | 12.16% | -18.05% | 6.62% | 39.37% | 26.43% | -17.36% | 34.60% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 0.09% | 6.76% | 3.21% | 5.53% | -8.88% | -1.68% | 7.16% | 6.83% | 0.30% | 2.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCWSX and BIMSX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, CCWSX and BIMSX have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCWSX vs. BIMSX — Risk / Return Rank
CCWSX
BIMSX
CCWSX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCWSX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.27 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 1.95 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | 5.63 | -5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCWSX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCWSX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than BIMSX's maximum drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCWSX and BIMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCWSX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -13.07% | -21.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -1.87% | -17.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.75% | -2.57% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -13.00% | -21.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.68% | -1.07% | -8.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -1.59% | -7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.47% | 0.65% | +6.82% |
Volatility
CCWSX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison
Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) at 0.86%. This indicates that CCWSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCWSX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 0.86% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.35% | 1.86% | +12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 2.50% | +14.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 3.88% | +14.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 3.25% | +15.24% |
CCWSX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCWSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMSX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCWSX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison
CCWSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than BIMSX's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.60% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 2.81% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 3.08% | 2.16% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.21% |
CCWSX Chautauqua International Growth Fund | 1.51% | 1.43% | 0.45% | 0.16% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.28% | 1.85% | 2.25% | 3.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCWSX and BIMSX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCWSX has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to BIMSX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCWSX dropped -34.59% vs BIMSX's -13.07%.
BIMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCWSX and BIMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer