CCWSX vs. BMDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX).
CCWSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Apr 14, 2016. BMDSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Dec 29, 2000.
Performance
CCWSX vs. BMDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCWSX vs. BMDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCWSX Chautauqua International Growth Fund | -16.07% | 19.17% | 11.30% | 12.16% | -18.05% | 6.62% | 39.37% | 26.43% | -17.36% | 34.60% |
BMDSX Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund | -5.21% | 4.88% | -1.16% | 19.91% | -27.86% | 21.81% | 34.56% | 35.94% | -1.52% | 25.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCWSX achieves a -16.07% return, which is significantly lower than BMDSX's -5.21% return.
CCWSX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -14.16%
- YTD
- -16.07%
- 6M
- -15.98%
- 1Y
- -4.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
BMDSX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- 10.09%
- 3Y*
- 1.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCWSX vs. BMDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CCWSX and BMDSX have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Return for Risk
CCWSX vs. BMDSX — Risk / Return Rank
CCWSX
BMDSX
CCWSX vs. BMDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCWSX | BMDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | 0.41 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | 0.94 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.12 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 0.63 | -0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 1.69 | -2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCWSX | BMDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 0.41 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.02 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.34 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCWSX and BMDSX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CCWSX vs. BMDSX - Dividend Comparison
CCWSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than BMDSX's 29.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCWSX Chautauqua International Growth Fund | 1.70% | 1.43% | 0.45% | 0.16% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.28% | 1.85% | 2.25% | 3.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BMDSX Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund | 29.29% | 27.76% | 4.57% | 2.44% | 1.79% | 17.82% | 10.09% | 5.77% | 6.62% | 4.87% | 0.00% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
CCWSX vs. BMDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCWSX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum BMDSX drawdown of -53.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCWSX and BMDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCWSX | BMDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -53.96% | +19.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -12.95% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -36.24% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.75% | -18.22% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -10.72% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 4.80% | +0.52% |
Volatility
CCWSX vs. BMDSX - Volatility Comparison
Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX) at 5.08%. This indicates that CCWSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCWSX | BMDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 5.08% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 18.40% | -6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.25% | 25.22% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 22.15% | -4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 21.32% | -2.91% |