PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCSZX vs. LBSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCSZX vs. LBSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSZX achieves a 27.43% return, which is significantly higher than LBSAX's 12.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CCSZX has underperformed LBSAX with an annualized return of 8.11%, while LBSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.


CCSZX

1D
0.08%
1M
6.51%
6M
19.90%
YTD
27.43%
1Y
40.78%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
8.11%
ALL TIME*
2.19%

LBSAX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.72%
6M
7.07%
YTD
12.07%
1Y
21.74%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
12.30%
ALL TIME*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CCSZX vs. LBSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCSZX
Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund
27.43%15.36%7.11%-6.90%15.80%31.34%-1.17%7.45%-14.09%1.71%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
12.07%15.58%14.73%10.26%-5.19%25.97%7.48%27.84%-4.62%19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSZX and LBSAX is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2012

0.21

The correlation between CCSZX and LBSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCSZX vs. LBSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCSZX
CCSZX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CCSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CCSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LBSAX
LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCSZX vs. LBSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCSZXLBSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.83

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

14.56

-3.08

CCSZX vs. LBSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the LBSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSZX and LBSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCSZX vs. LBSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSZX drawdown since its inception was -61.34%, which is greater than LBSAX's maximum drawdown of -47.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSZX and LBSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCSZXLBSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.34%

-47.89%

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-5.52%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-13.03%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.86%

-17.16%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.16%

-32.82%

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.20%

-1.18%

-4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.09%

-5.22%

-25.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

1.46%

+2.11%

Volatility

CCSZX vs. LBSAX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) at 2.41%. This indicates that CCSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCSZXLBSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.41%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

6.74%

+7.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

9.22%

+7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

13.22%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.88%

15.67%

-0.79%

CCSZX vs. LBSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than LBSAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCSZX vs. LBSAX - Dividend Comparison

CCSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than LBSAX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCSZX
Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund
2.35%3.00%8.84%4.42%94.73%36.39%0.13%1.09%18.52%0.09%0.00%0.00%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
4.58%5.11%5.78%4.72%3.62%2.65%1.52%2.68%7.36%3.83%3.60%8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCSZX and LBSAX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCSZX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to LBSAX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSZX dropped -61.34% vs LBSAX's -47.89%.

CCSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCSZX and LBSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer