CCSZX vs. DBCMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CCSZX (Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund) and DBCMX (DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, CCSZX returned 8.09%/yr vs 7.53%/yr for DBCMX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CCSZX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for DBCMX.

Performance

CCSZX vs. DBCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSZX achieves a 27.33% return, which is significantly lower than DBCMX's 29.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CCSZX has outperformed DBCMX with an annualized return of 8.09%, while DBCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.53% annualized return.

CCSZX

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 6.43%
• 6M: 15.10%
• YTD: 27.33%
• 1Y: 40.67%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: 8.09%
• ALL TIME*: 2.19%

DBCMX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 8.57%
• 6M: 23.78%
• YTD: 29.78%
• 1Y: 35.56%
• 3Y*: 9.18%
• 5Y*: 9.45%
• 10Y*: 7.53%
• ALL TIME*: 7.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CCSZX vs. DBCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	27.33%	15.36%	7.11%	-6.90%	15.80%	31.34%	-1.17%	7.45%	-14.09%	1.71%
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund	29.78%	6.10%	0.45%	-3.96%	13.40%	31.24%	-6.07%	4.78%	-10.65%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSZX and DBCMX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.78

The correlation between CCSZX and DBCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CCSZX vs. DBCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCSZX

CCSZX Risk / Return Rank: 85
CCSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CCSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CCSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CCSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CCSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

DBCMX

DBCMX Risk / Return Rank: 85
DBCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DBCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DBCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DBCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DBCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCSZX vs. DBCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCSZX	DBCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.28	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	3.08	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	2.79	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.76	10.33	+0.43

CCSZX vs. DBCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the DBCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSZX and DBCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCSZX vs. DBCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSZX drawdown since its inception was -61.34%, which is greater than DBCMX's maximum drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSZX and DBCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSZX	DBCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.34%	-37.62%	-23.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.97%	-11.98%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.97%	-14.75%	+2.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.86%	-27.60%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.16%	-37.62%	+3.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.27%	-3.20%	-2.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.10%	-13.16%	-17.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	3.25%	+0.30%

Volatility

CCSZX vs. DBCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) is 3.54%, while DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that CCSZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSZX	DBCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	4.43%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.16%	12.88%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.93%	14.67%	+2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.86%	16.24%	+0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.89%	14.61%	+0.28%

CCSZX vs. DBCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than DBCMX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCSZX vs. DBCMX - Dividend Comparison

CCSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, which matches DBCMX's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	2.35%	3.00%	8.84%	4.42%	94.73%	36.39%	0.13%	1.09%	18.52%	0.09%	0.00%
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund	2.34%	3.04%	2.89%	3.30%	46.88%	13.53%	0.00%	1.04%	1.21%	5.23%	0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSZX and DBCMX in my portfolio?

CCSZX and DBCMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSZX or DBCMX?

DBCMX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to CCSZX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSZX dropped -61.34% vs DBCMX's -37.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.