CCSZX vs. BRCYX
CCSZX (Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund) and BRCYX (Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, CCSZX returned 6.77%/yr vs 6.87%/yr for BRCYX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CCSZX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for BRCYX.
Performance
CCSZX vs. BRCYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCSZX achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly higher than BRCYX's 20.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CCSZX having a 6.77% annualized return and BRCYX not far ahead at 6.87%.
CCSZX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -6.97%
- YTD
- 21.56%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 29.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
BRCYX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -10.16%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 34.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 6.87%
CCSZX vs. BRCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund | 21.56% | 15.36% | 7.11% | -6.90% | 15.80% | 31.34% | -1.17% | 7.45% | -14.09% | 1.71% |
BRCYX Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund | 20.35% | 18.82% | 5.70% | -3.15% | 7.94% | 19.54% | 7.89% | 4.49% | -12.03% | 4.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCSZX and BRCYX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2012 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CCSZX and BRCYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCSZX vs. BRCYX — Risk / Return Rank
CCSZX
BRCYX
CCSZX vs. BRCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCSZX | BRCYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 2.44 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 10.36 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCSZX vs. BRCYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCSZX drawdown since its inception was -61.34%, roughly equal to the maximum BRCYX drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSZX and BRCYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCSZX | BRCYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.34% | -60.05% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -13.66% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.17% | -13.66% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.86% | -20.42% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.16% | -38.09% | +3.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.56% | -13.66% | +4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.26% | -27.15% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.26% | -0.37% |
Volatility
CCSZX vs. BRCYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) is 3.75%, while Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that CCSZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRCYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCSZX | BRCYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 4.39% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 15.79% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 17.69% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 15.71% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 14.30% | +0.61% |
CCSZX vs. BRCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCSZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than BRCYX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCSZX vs. BRCYX - Dividend Comparison
CCSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than BRCYX's 11.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCYX Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund | 11.39% | 13.71% | 4.95% | 3.71% | 9.93% | 16.64% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 0.25% | 0.01% | 2.74% |
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund | 2.47% | 3.00% | 8.84% | 4.42% | 94.73% | 36.39% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 18.52% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CCSZX and BRCYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BRCYX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to CCSZX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSZX dropped -61.34% vs BRCYX's -60.05%.
BRCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCSZX and BRCYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer