PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCSZX vs. GSFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCSZX vs. GSFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSZX achieves a 29.96% return, which is significantly higher than GSFTX's 8.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CCSZX has underperformed GSFTX with an annualized return of 7.81%, while GSFTX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return.


CCSZX

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
29.96%
6M
29.38%
1Y
42.95%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
13.19%
10Y*
7.81%

GSFTX

1D
0.93%
1M
1.48%
YTD
8.09%
6M
8.45%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSZX vs. GSFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCSZX
Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund
29.96%15.36%7.11%-6.90%15.80%31.34%-1.17%7.45%-14.09%1.71%
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
8.09%15.88%15.00%10.57%-4.94%26.26%7.75%28.12%-4.38%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSZX and GSFTX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2012

0.22

Over the past year, the correlation between CCSZX and GSFTX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCSZX vs. GSFTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSZX
CCSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CCSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CCSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GSFTX
GSFTX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GSFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GSFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSZX vs. GSFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCSZXGSFTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.38

3.81

+2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.57

14.36

+3.21

CCSZX vs. GSFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the GSFTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSZX and GSFTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCSZXGSFTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.31

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.81

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.80

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.54

-0.38

Drawdowns

CCSZX vs. GSFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSZX drawdown since its inception was -61.34%, which is greater than GSFTX's maximum drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSZX and GSFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCSZXGSFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.34%

-47.69%

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-5.51%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.17%

-13.01%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.86%

-17.01%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.16%

-32.76%

-1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-0.28%

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-6.37%

-24.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.46%

+1.02%

Volatility

CCSZX vs. GSFTX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) at 2.47%. This indicates that CCSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSFTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCSZXGSFTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

2.47%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.46%

6.87%

+7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

9.06%

+7.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

13.27%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

15.69%

-0.76%

CCSZX vs. GSFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GSFTX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCSZX vs. GSFTX - Dividend Comparison

CCSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than GSFTX's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCSZX
Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund
2.31%3.00%8.84%4.42%94.73%36.39%0.13%1.09%18.52%0.09%0.00%0.00%
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
4.99%5.35%6.02%4.96%3.87%2.87%1.74%2.90%7.63%4.00%3.77%8.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCSZX and GSFTX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCSZX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to GSFTX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSZX dropped -61.34% vs GSFTX's -47.69%.

CCSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCSZX and GSFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer