CCSO vs. FTWO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CCSO (Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF) and FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCSO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Carbon Collective, while FTWO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. CCSO is actively managed, while FTWO is passively managed. Over the past year, CCSO returned 26.08% vs 24.37% for FTWO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCSO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FTWO.

Performance

CCSO vs. FTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSO achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than FTWO's 7.77% return.

CCSO

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 6M: 10.17%
• 1Y: 26.08%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTWO

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: 7.77%
• 6M: 6.31%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSO vs. FTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	12.49%	21.79%	3.89%	-0.11%
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	7.77%	43.06%	14.97%	0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSO and FTWO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.71

The correlation between CCSO and FTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

CCSO vs. FTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CCSO	FTWO
Industrials	47.4%	33.1%
Basic Materials	16.3%	26.8%
Technology	11.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	-
Utilities	7.8%	11.2%
Energy	7.0%	27.9%
Financial Services	0.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	1.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CCSO vs. FTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSO

CCSO Risk / Return Rank: 38
CCSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CCSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CCSO Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CCSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CCSO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 37
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSO vs. FTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCSO	FTWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.31	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.83	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	1.68	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.30	4.88	+1.42

CCSO vs. FTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSO Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the FTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSO and FTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCSO vs. FTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSO drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, which is greater than FTWO's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSO and FTWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSO	FTWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.69%	-18.17%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.62%	-14.55%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.75%	-11.75%	+4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-3.57%	-3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	5.00%	-0.85%

Volatility

CCSO vs. FTWO - Volatility Comparison

Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) at 6.27%. This indicates that CCSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSO	FTWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.06%	6.27%	+2.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.69%	15.08%	+2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.49%	18.71%	+3.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.36%	19.31%	+4.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.36%	19.31%	+4.05%

CCSO vs. FTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCSO vs. FTWO - Dividend Comparison

CCSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than FTWO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	0.56%	0.63%	0.53%	0.80%	0.24%
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	1.04%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSO and FTWO in my portfolio?

CCSO and FTWO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSO or FTWO?

CCSO has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to FTWO (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSO dropped -23.69% vs FTWO's -18.17%.

Which ETF is better, CCSO or FTWO?

On 1-year performance, CCSO leads with 26.08% vs 24.37% for FTWO. On fees, CCSO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FTWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CCSO or FTWO?

Over the 1-year period, CCSO has performed better with a 26.08% return vs 24.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCSO or FTWO?

CCSO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FTWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCSO or FTWO?

FTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.56% for CCSO.

What is the main difference between CCSO and FTWO?

CCSO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FTWO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Carbon Collective and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CCSO and 0.49% for FTWO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.