CCSO vs. ICLN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CCSO (Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF) and ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCSO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Carbon Collective, while ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. CCSO is actively managed, while ICLN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CCSO returned 14.50%/yr vs 6.74%/yr for ICLN. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCSO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ICLN.

Performance

CCSO vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSO achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 26.14% return.

CCSO

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 6M: 10.17%
• 1Y: 26.08%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ICLN

• 1D: -4.44%
• 1M: -7.52%
• YTD: 26.14%
• 6M: 25.31%
• 1Y: 64.46%
• 3Y*: 6.74%
• 5Y*: -0.79%
• 10Y*: 11.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSO vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	12.49%	21.79%	3.89%	14.58%	-12.52%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	26.14%	47.05%	-25.72%	-20.41%	-9.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSO and ICLN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022	0.75

The correlation between CCSO and ICLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

CCSO vs. ICLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CCSO	ICLN
Industrials	47.4%	28.7%
Basic Materials	16.3%	1.3%
Technology	11.7%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	0.1%
Utilities	7.8%	34.6%
Energy	7.0%	23.7%
Financial Services	0.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CCSO vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSO

CCSO Risk / Return Rank: 38
CCSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CCSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CCSO Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CCSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CCSO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

ICLN

ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 70
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSO vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCSO	ICLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	2.27	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.84	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.36	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.96	-1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.30	13.73	-7.43

CCSO vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSO Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSO and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCSO vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSO drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSO and ICLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSO	ICLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.69%	-87.15%	+63.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.62%	-16.38%	+4.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.69%	-43.18%	+19.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.75%	-43.56%	+35.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-66.53%	+59.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	4.71%	-0.56%

Volatility

CCSO vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) is 9.06%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that CCSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSO	ICLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.06%	13.47%	-4.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.69%	23.14%	-5.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.49%	28.52%	-6.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.36%	27.69%	-4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.36%	27.33%	-3.97%

CCSO vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCSO vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

CCSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ICLN's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	0.56%	0.63%	0.53%	0.80%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	0.89%	1.63%	1.85%	1.59%	0.89%	1.18%	0.34%	1.36%	2.77%	2.49%	3.88%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSO and ICLN in my portfolio?

CCSO and ICLN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSO or ICLN?

ICLN has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to CCSO (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSO dropped -23.69% vs ICLN's -87.15%.

Which ETF is better, CCSO or ICLN?

On 3-year performance, CCSO leads with 14.50% vs 6.74% for ICLN. On fees, CCSO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CCSO has been the lower-risk option at 9.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CCSO or ICLN?

Over the 3-year period, CCSO has performed better with a 14.50% return vs 6.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCSO or ICLN?

CCSO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ICLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCSO or ICLN?

ICLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.56% for CCSO.

What is the main difference between CCSO and ICLN?

CCSO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Carbon Collective and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CCSO and 0.39% for ICLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.