CCSO vs. EUSA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CCSO (Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF) and EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. CCSO is actively managed, while EUSA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CCSO returned 9.97%/yr vs 14.35%/yr for EUSA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CCSO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for EUSA.

Performance

CCSO vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSO achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly lower than EUSA's 11.56% return.

CCSO

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -5.32%
• 6M: 2.95%
• YTD: 8.55%
• 1Y: 16.37%
• 3Y*: 9.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EUSA

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 8.06%
• YTD: 11.56%
• 1Y: 16.27%
• 3Y*: 14.35%
• 5Y*: 8.07%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSO vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	8.55%	21.79%	3.89%	14.58%	-12.52%
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	11.56%	10.24%	14.64%	17.72%	0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSO and EUSA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022	0.81

The correlation between CCSO and EUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CCSO vs. EUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CCSO	EUSA
Industrials	47.4%	15.3%
Basic Materials	16.3%	4.3%
Technology	11.7%	20.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	11.1%
Utilities	7.8%	5.4%
Energy	7.0%	3.8%
Financial Services	0.5%	14.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	5.3%
Communication Services	-	4.0%
Healthcare	-	10.8%
Real Estate	-	5.2%

Return for Risk

CCSO vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSO

CCSO Risk / Return Rank: 28
CCSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CCSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CCSO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CCSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CCSO Martin Ratio Rank: 31

EUSA

EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 51
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 46
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSO vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCSO	EUSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	1.36	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	1.98	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.24	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	2.09	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	8.22	-4.67

CCSO vs. EUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the EUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSO and EUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCSO vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSO drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, smaller than the maximum EUSA drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSO and EUSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSO	EUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.69%	-39.16%	+15.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.62%	-7.82%	-3.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.69%	-18.20%	-5.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.99%	-0.71%	-10.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.20%	-4.57%	-2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.62%	1.98%	+2.64%

Volatility

CCSO vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison

Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) at 3.03%. This indicates that CCSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSO	EUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	3.03%	+3.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.70%	8.94%	+8.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.69%	12.01%	+10.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.31%	16.98%	+6.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.31%	18.27%	+5.04%

CCSO vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCSO vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison

CCSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than EUSA's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	0.58%	0.63%	0.53%	0.80%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.47%	1.53%	1.73%	1.23%	1.45%	1.49%	2.01%	1.50%	1.59%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSO and EUSA in my portfolio?

CCSO and EUSA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSO or EUSA?

CCSO has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to EUSA (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSO dropped -23.69% vs EUSA's -39.16%.

Which ETF is better, CCSO or EUSA?

On 3-year performance, EUSA leads with 14.35% vs 9.97% for CCSO. On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CCSO or EUSA?

Over the 3-year period, EUSA has performed better with a 14.35% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCSO or EUSA?

EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CCSO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCSO or EUSA?

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.58% for CCSO.

What is the main difference between CCSO and EUSA?

They also come from different issuers: Carbon Collective and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CCSO and 0.09% for EUSA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.