CCRV vs. CCOM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. CCRV is passively managed, while CCOM is actively managed. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CCOM.

Performance

CCRV vs. CCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CCRV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CCOM

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -1.27%
• 6M: 0.22%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	$489.06	$1.63K	$4.84K

CCRV vs. CCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	-3.71%

Return for Risk

CCRV vs. CCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CCRV	CCOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.67%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCRV	CCOM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.48%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.48%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	12.48%	—

CCRV vs. CCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCRV vs. CCOM - Dividend Comparison

CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	7.26%	33.27%	26.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CCRV or CCOM?

On fees, CCRV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCRV or CCOM?

CCRV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCRV or CCOM?

CCOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.

What is the main difference between CCRV and CCOM?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.99% for CCOM.