CCRN vs. MED
CCRN (Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.) and MED (Medifast, Inc.) are both stocks. CCRN operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while MED operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CCRN returned -0.27%/yr vs -7.79%/yr for MED. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCRN vs. MED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCRN achieves a 62.59% return, which is significantly higher than MED's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRN has outperformed MED with an annualized return of -0.27%, while MED has yielded a comparatively lower -7.79% annualized return.
CCRN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 62.59%
- 6M
- 65.45%
- 1Y
- -6.13%
- 3Y*
- -20.79%
- 5Y*
- -5.69%
- 10Y*
- -0.27%
MED
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- -2.74%
- 1Y
- -22.01%
- 3Y*
- -49.36%
- 5Y*
- -46.41%
- 10Y*
- -7.79%
CCRN vs. MED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 62.59% | -55.40% | -19.79% | -14.79% | -4.29% | 212.97% | -23.67% | 58.53% | -42.55% | -18.26% |
MED Medifast, Inc. | 3.18% | -39.39% | -73.79% | -38.34% | -42.31% | 9.36% | 86.18% | -9.73% | 82.11% | 72.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRN and MED is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2001 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
CCRN:
$414.46M
MED:
$121.29M
CCRN:
-$3.06
MED:
-$1.82
CCRN:
0.56
MED:
0.35
CCRN:
1.32
MED:
0.61
CCRN:
$760.89M
MED:
$346.10M
CCRN:
$138.12M
MED:
$242.70M
CCRN:
$9.42M
MED:
-$3.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRN vs. MED — Risk / Return Rank
CCRN
MED
CCRN vs. MED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) and Medifast, Inc. (MED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCRN | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.93 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | -0.59 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | -1.00 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCRN vs. MED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCRN drawdown since its inception was -90.04%, smaller than the maximum MED drawdown of -98.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRN and MED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRN | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.04% | -98.40% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.08% | -37.39% | -9.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.43% | -90.91% | +17.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.24% | -96.29% | +16.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.24% | -96.76% | +16.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.11% | -96.26% | +30.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.46% | -50.87% | -13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.26% | 22.13% | +3.13% |
Volatility
CCRN vs. MED - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) is 0.84%, while Medifast, Inc. (MED) has a volatility of 10.40%. This indicates that CCRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRN | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 10.40% | -9.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.60% | 31.76% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.58% | 41.83% | +13.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.02% | 45.28% | +14.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.88% | 47.73% | +9.15% |
Dividends
CCRN vs. MED - Dividend Comparison
Neither CCRN nor MED has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MED Medifast, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.36% | 5.69% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 3.08% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 2.57% | 0.82% |
Financials
CCRN vs. MED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. and Medifast, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRN and MED have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MED has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to CCRN (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCRN dropped -90.04% vs MED's -98.40%.
CCRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCRN and MED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer