CCOM vs. ISCMF
CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds. CCOM is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CCOM charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
CCOM vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCOM
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCOM vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | -1.23% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 14.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOM and ISCMF is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOM vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
CCOM
ISCMF
CCOM vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCOM | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.45 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
CCOM vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOM drawdown since its inception was -5.40%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOM | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -25.42% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -5.26% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -13.43% | +11.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.42% | — |
Volatility
CCOM vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOM | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 18.53% | -4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 14.38% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 14.38% | -0.81% |
CCOM vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOM has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOM vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
CCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | 0.82% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOM and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.
CCOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CCOM and 0.19% for ISCMF.
Find the right allocation for CCOM and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer