CCNR vs. METL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both Natural Resources funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCNR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.

Performance

CCNR vs. METL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCNR achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 2.07% return.

CCNR

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -10.14%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 6M: 13.08%
• 1Y: 50.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METL

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -11.44%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCNR vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	13.61%	17.03%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	2.07%	28.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CCNR and METL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

CCNR vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCNR

CCNR Risk / Return Rank: 87
CCNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CCNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CCNR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CCNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CCNR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

METL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCNR vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCNR	METL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.14	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.81	—	—

Drawdowns

CCNR vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCNR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum METL drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCNR and METL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCNR	METL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.06%	-27.39%	+7.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.67%	-22.61%	+10.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.67%	-8.78%	+5.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCNR	METL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.94%	45.00%	-26.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	45.00%	-24.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.18%	45.00%	-24.82%

CCNR vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCNR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCNR vs. METL - Dividend Comparison

CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than METL's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	3.07%	3.48%	1.27%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.97%	0.99%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCNR and METL in my portfolio?

CCNR and METL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCNR or METL?

On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCNR or METL?

CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCNR or METL?

CCNR has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.97% for METL.

What is the main difference between CCNR and METL?

They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CCNR and 0.89% for METL.