CCNR vs. GNR
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR).
CCNR and GNR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCNR is an actively managed fund by ALPS. It was launched on Jul 10, 2024. GNR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2010.
Performance
CCNR vs. GNR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCNR vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 22.34% | 46.48% | -8.12% |
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 20.16% | 28.68% | -10.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCNR achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than GNR's 20.16% return.
CCNR
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 22.34%
- 6M
- 35.50%
- 1Y
- 71.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GNR
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 20.16%
- 6M
- 28.10%
- 1Y
- 44.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCNR vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCNR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCNR vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank
CCNR
GNR
CCNR vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCNR | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.20 | 2.16 | +1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.76 | 2.75 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.42 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 2.98 | +1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.94 | 15.63 | +10.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCNR | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20 | 2.16 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 0.26 | +1.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCNR and GNR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CCNR vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison
CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than GNR's 2.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 2.85% | 3.48% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 2.30% | 2.76% | 4.73% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
CCNR vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCNR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCNR and GNR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCNR | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.06% | -51.37% | +31.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.01% | -14.80% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -1.59% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -15.10% | +11.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.83% | -0.11% |
Volatility
CCNR vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) have volatilities of 6.41% and 6.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCNR | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 6.47% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.67% | 13.76% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.39% | 20.70% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 20.36% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 22.01% | -1.60% |