PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCLAX vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCLAX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCLAX achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CCLAX has underperformed TPDAX with an annualized return of 5.68%, while TPDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.13% annualized return.


CCLAX

1D
0.20%
1M
2.03%
YTD
4.31%
6M
4.80%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
5.68%

TPDAX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
10.43%
6M
11.92%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
7.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCLAX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCLAX
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund
4.31%10.23%6.39%10.07%-14.32%7.73%12.18%15.62%-2.96%8.28%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
10.43%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%8.83%13.77%-7.24%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CCLAX and TPDAX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2009

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between CCLAX and TPDAX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCLAX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCLAX
CCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCLAX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCLAXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

2.33

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.10

3.00

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.37

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.75

11.68

-0.92

CCLAX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCLAX and TPDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCLAXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.33

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.83

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.72

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.59

+0.25

Drawdowns

CCLAX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCLAX drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLAX and TPDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCLAXTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-22.29%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-7.58%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.90%

-7.58%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.86%

-17.58%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.86%

-22.29%

+3.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.00%

+4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-4.92%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

2.19%

-1.07%

Volatility

CCLAX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) is 2.20%, while Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that CCLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCLAXTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

2.85%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

9.49%

-4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

11.19%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

10.18%

-3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.75%

9.90%

-3.15%

CCLAX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCLAX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCLAX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

CCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than TPDAX's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCLAX
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund
3.14%3.31%3.37%3.24%2.22%5.37%4.16%4.14%4.83%2.22%3.52%5.82%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.73%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCLAX and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPDAX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to CCLAX (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCLAX dropped -23.98% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.

TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCLAX and TPDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer