PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCLAX vs. CULAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCLAX vs. CULAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) and Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCLAX achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly higher than CULAX's 1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CCLAX has outperformed CULAX with an annualized return of 5.71%, while CULAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.46% annualized return.


CCLAX

1D
0.67%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.47%
6M
4.52%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
5.71%

CULAX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCLAX vs. CULAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCLAX
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund
4.47%10.23%6.39%10.07%-14.32%7.73%12.18%15.62%-2.96%8.28%
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
1.34%4.55%5.69%6.07%-0.56%0.43%0.66%3.30%1.15%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CCLAX and CULAX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006

0.17

The correlation between CCLAX and CULAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCLAX vs. CULAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCLAX
CCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CULAX
CULAX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CULAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CULAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CULAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CULAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CULAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCLAX vs. CULAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) and Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCLAXCULAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

4.07

-2.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

13.63

-11.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

55.94

-45.63

CCLAX vs. CULAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the CULAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCLAX and CULAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCLAX vs. CULAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCLAX drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, which is greater than CULAX's maximum drawdown of -7.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLAX and CULAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCLAXCULAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-7.40%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-0.30%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.90%

-0.30%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.86%

-2.19%

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.86%

-7.40%

-11.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-0.21%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

0.07%

+1.07%

Volatility

CCLAX vs. CULAX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) at 0.34%. This indicates that CCLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CULAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCLAXCULAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

0.34%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.14%

0.86%

+4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

1.31%

+4.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.19%

1.35%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.78%

1.42%

+5.36%

CCLAX vs. CULAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCLAX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than CULAX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCLAX vs. CULAX - Dividend Comparison

CCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than CULAX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCLAX
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund
3.14%3.31%3.37%3.24%2.22%5.37%4.16%4.14%4.83%2.22%3.52%5.82%
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
3.91%4.13%4.90%4.52%1.47%0.64%1.25%2.44%2.10%1.13%1.10%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCLAX and CULAX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCLAX has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to CULAX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCLAX dropped -23.98% vs CULAX's -7.40%.

CULAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCLAX and CULAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer