CCJ vs. KAP.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L).

Performance

CCJ vs. KAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCJ vs. KAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CCJ Cameco Corporation	18.71%	78.38%	19.47%	90.49%	4.35%	63.19%	51.47%	-21.08%	-2.34%
KAP.L National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR	39.78%	55.89%	-1.79%	55.11%	-17.73%	114.56%	48.52%	1.24%	13.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CCJ : $47.30B KAP.L : $20.23B
EPS CCJ : $1.35 KAP.L : $2.66K
PE Ratio CCJ : 80.24 KAP.L : 0.03
PEG Ratio CCJ : 0.67 KAP.L : 0.00
PS Ratio CCJ : 13.59 KAP.L : 0.01
PB Ratio CCJ : 6.86 KAP.L : 0.01
Total Revenue (TTM) CCJ : $3.48B KAP.L : $1.88T
Gross Profit (TTM) CCJ : $1.02B KAP.L : $988.54B
EBITDA (TTM) CCJ : $1.05B KAP.L : $1.11T

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly lower than KAP.L's 39.78% return.

CCJ

• 1D: 5.61%
• 1M: -8.27%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 6M: 29.77%
• 1Y: 164.39%
• 3Y*: 61.02%
• 5Y*: 44.84%
• 10Y*: 25.21%

KAP.L

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -4.88%
• YTD: 39.78%
• 6M: 46.34%
• 1Y: 151.95%
• 3Y*: 46.84%
• 5Y*: 32.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CCJ vs. KAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCJ

CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 95
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

KAP.L

KAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
KAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
KAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
KAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
KAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCJ vs. KAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCJ	KAP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	3.25	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	3.63	-0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.46	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.23	8.18	-1.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.57	24.32	-7.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCJ vs. KAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the KAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCJ and KAP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCJ	KAP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03	3.25	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.70	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.85	-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between CCJ and KAP.L is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CCJ vs. KAP.L - Dividend Comparison

CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than KAP.L's 2.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCJ Cameco Corporation	0.16%	0.19%	0.22%	0.20%	0.39%	0.29%	0.46%	0.67%	0.53%	4.33%	3.82%	3.24%
KAP.L National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR	2.94%	4.11%	6.85%	4.25%	6.44%	3.69%	5.14%	6.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CCJ vs. KAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, which is greater than KAP.L's maximum drawdown of -49.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and KAP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCJ	KAP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.53%	-49.67%	-37.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.69%	-17.34%	-8.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.01%	-49.67%	+9.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.00%	-9.30%	-9.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.29%	-15.07%	-31.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.67%	5.84%	+3.83%

Volatility

CCJ vs. KAP.L - Volatility Comparison

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a higher volatility of 17.51% compared to National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L) at 15.65%. This indicates that CCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCJ	KAP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.51%	15.65%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.70%	38.70%	+3.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.64%	46.55%	+8.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.71%	47.17%	+2.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.28%	42.92%	+3.36%

Financials

CCJ vs. KAP.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cameco Corporation and National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 266.88M and revenue of 1.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.

KAP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported a gross profit of 266.34B and revenue of 543.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 163.55M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.

KAP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported an operating income of 247.70B and revenue of 543.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.6%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 198.90M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

KAP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported a net income of 219.63B and revenue of 543.13B, resulting in a net margin of 40.4%.