CCIF vs. NMAI
CCIF (Carlyle Credit Income Fund) and NMAI (Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund) are both mutual funds - CCIF is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Carlyle, while NMAI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Nuveen. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CCIF returned -17.19%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for NMAI. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCIF vs. NMAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCIF achieves a -30.01% return, which is significantly lower than NMAI's 11.79% return.
CCIF
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- YTD
- -30.01%
- 6M
- -29.41%
- 1Y
- -40.61%
- 3Y*
- -17.19%
- 5Y*
- -9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
NMAI
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCIF vs. NMAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | -30.01% | -27.64% | 16.37% | 14.50% | -6.37% | -1.99% |
NMAI Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund | 11.79% | 20.03% | 11.65% | 19.52% | -26.38% | -4.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCIF and NMAI is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCIF vs. NMAI — Risk / Return Rank
CCIF
NMAI
CCIF vs. NMAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCIF | NMAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.34 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 2.07 | -2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 8.67 | -10.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCIF vs. NMAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCIF drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than NMAI's maximum drawdown of -37.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIF and NMAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCIF | NMAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -37.40% | -15.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.20% | -11.88% | -33.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.23% | -13.05% | -40.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.66% | -1.78% | -49.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -13.91% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.34% | 2.83% | +23.51% |
Volatility
CCIF vs. NMAI - Volatility Comparison
Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) at 4.67%. This indicates that CCIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCIF | NMAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 4.67% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.17% | 11.23% | +14.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.51% | 13.14% | +17.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 16.65% | +3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 16.65% | +8.83% |
Dividends
CCIF vs. NMAI - Dividend Comparison
CCIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.70%, more than NMAI's 10.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | 44.70% | 26.87% | 15.73% | 23.58% | 9.96% | 8.55% | 6.09% | 3.77% |
NMAI Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund | 10.41% | 9.89% | 13.73% | 10.57% | 19.45% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCIF and NMAI have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCIF has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to NMAI (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCIF dropped -53.23% vs NMAI's -37.40%.
NMAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCIF and NMAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer