CCIF vs. MCDWX
CCIF (Carlyle Credit Income Fund) and MCDWX (Manning & Napier Credit Series) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CCIF returned -7.85%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for MCDWX. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CCIF vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCIF achieves a -27.42% return, which is significantly lower than MCDWX's 0.57% return.
CCIF
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -26.29%
- YTD
- -27.42%
- 1Y
- -32.20%
- 3Y*
- -13.25%
- 5Y*
- -7.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.90%
MCDWX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $341.97K | $279.28K | $351.59K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CCIF vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | -27.42% | -27.64% | 16.37% | 14.50% | -6.37% | 12.67% | 18.34% |
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | 0.57% | 7.57% | 4.13% | 7.31% | -11.13% | 0.01% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCIF and MCDWX is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2020 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCIF vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank
CCIF
MCDWX
CCIF vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCIF | MCDWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.27 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.86 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 5.41 | -6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCIF vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCIF drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than MCDWX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIF and MCDWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCIF | MCDWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -15.96% | -37.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.95% | -2.17% | -39.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.23% | -3.68% | -49.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.23% | -15.95% | -37.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.87% | -0.94% | -48.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.59% | -4.07% | -8.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.03% | 0.74% | +25.29% |
Volatility
CCIF vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison
Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) at 0.69%. This indicates that CCIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCIF | MCDWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 0.69% | +4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.36% | 2.33% | +24.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.64% | 2.86% | +26.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 4.63% | +15.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 4.34% | +21.05% |
Dividends
CCIF vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison
CCIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.45%, more than MCDWX's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | 42.45% | 26.87% | 15.73% | 23.58% | 9.96% | 8.55% | 6.09% | 3.77% |
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | 4.55% | 4.83% | 4.41% | 4.48% | 3.25% | 4.45% | 2.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCIF and MCDWX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCIF has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to MCDWX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCIF dropped -53.23% vs MCDWX's -15.96%.
MCDWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCIF and MCDWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer