CTEN.DE vs. CSSC.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE).
CTEN.DE and CSSC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CTEN.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Mar 27, 2023. CSSC.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Mar 27, 2023.
Performance
CTEN.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CTEN.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEN.DE CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP | -25.68% | -19.43% | 96.51% | 53.65% |
CSSC.DE CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP | -24.98% | -35.55% | 50.17% | 86.11% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CTEN.DE having a -25.68% return and CSSC.DE slightly higher at -24.98%.
CTEN.DE
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- -25.68%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- 1Y
- -18.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSSC.DE
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- -24.98%
- 6M
- -51.86%
- 1Y
- -22.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CTEN.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEN.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CSSC.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CTEN.DE vs. CSSC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CTEN.DE
CSSC.DE
CTEN.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTEN.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | -0.37 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | -0.17 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.39 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | -0.76 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTEN.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | -0.37 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.17 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEN.DE and CSSC.DE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CTEN.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CTEN.DE nor CSSC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CTEN.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, smaller than the maximum CSSC.DE drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEN.DE and CSSC.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEN.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.27% | -65.21% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.27% | -61.70% | +5.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.57% | -61.76% | +9.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -26.26% | +8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.08% | 31.43% | -4.35% |
Volatility
CTEN.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) have volatilities of 14.48% and 14.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CTEN.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.48% | 14.27% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.61% | 41.39% | -2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.22% | 59.72% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.83% | 60.74% | -7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.83% | 60.74% | -7.91% |