CCFE vs. COWZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCFE (Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. CCFE is actively managed, while COWZ is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCFE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.

Performance

CCFE vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCFE achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 8.18% return.

CCFE

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 4.22%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COWZ

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 22.23%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCFE vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCFE Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF	4.22%	7.81%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	8.18%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CCFE and COWZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

CCFE vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCFE vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCFE	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.65	-0.12

Drawdowns

CCFE vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCFE drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCFE and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCFE	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.15%	-38.63%	+17.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.92%	-0.91%	-12.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-4.81%	-1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCFE	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.56%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.40%	11.13%	+13.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.40%	17.63%	+6.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.40%	19.93%	+4.47%

CCFE vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCFE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCFE vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

CCFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than COWZ's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CCFE Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.99%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCFE and COWZ in my portfolio?

CCFE and COWZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCFE or COWZ?

On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCFE or COWZ?

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CCFE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCFE or COWZ?

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.02% for CCFE.

What is the main difference between CCFE and COWZ?

They also come from different issuers: Concourse Capital and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CCFE and 0.49% for COWZ.