CCEF vs. ZDIV.TO
CCEF (Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF) and ZDIV.TO (BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. CCEF is actively managed, while ZDIV.TO is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCEF charges 2.74%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZDIV.TO.
Performance
CCEF vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CCEF is traded in USD, while ZDIV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZDIV.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CCEF
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- 15.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCEF vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF | 2.12% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 13.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCEF and ZDIV.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCEF vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CCEF
ZDIV.TO
CCEF vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCEF | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCEF | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 4.83 | -3.34 |
Drawdowns
CCEF vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and ZDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCEF | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -2.48% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -1.56% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -0.54% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | — | — |
Volatility
CCEF vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCEF | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.94% | 10.10% | -2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 10.10% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 10.10% | +0.68% |
CCEF vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCEF vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than ZDIV.TO's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF | 7.98% | 8.08% | 6.55% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCEF and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.
They also come from different issuers: Calamos and BMO. Their fees differ too: 2.74% for CCEF and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for CCEF and ZDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer