CCEF vs. LVHI
CCEF (Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. CCEF is actively managed, while LVHI is passively managed. Over the past year, CCEF returned 12.87% vs 36.20% for LVHI. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CCEF charges 2.74%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
CCEF vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 18.29% return.
CCEF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 12.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.94%
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 1Y
- 36.20%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $74.18K | $103.33K | $101.25K | |
| $37.17M | $30.23M | $26.64M |
CCEF vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF | 6.53% | 13.47% | 17.80% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 18.29% | 27.12% | 14.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCEF and LVHI is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CCEF and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCEF vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
CCEF
LVHI
CCEF vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCEF | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.71 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 5.76 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 24.05 | -17.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCEF vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCEF | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -32.31% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -6.08% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.70% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -3.47% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.45% | +0.36% |
Volatility
CCEF vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) is 2.06%, while Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that CCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCEF | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 2.48% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | 7.58% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.41% | 9.46% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 11.05% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 13.70% | -3.04% |
CCEF vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCEF vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than LVHI's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF | 7.36% | 8.08% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.51% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCEF and LVHI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to CCEF (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEF dropped -13.25% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 1-year performance, LVHI leads with 36.20% vs 12.87% for CCEF. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, CCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 36.20% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.
CCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 4.51% for LVHI.
They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 2.74% for CCEF and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCEF and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer