PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCEF vs. DEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCEF vs. DEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than DEW's 19.31% return.


CCEF

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.32%
6M
3.30%
YTD
6.53%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.94%

DEW

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.29%
6M
12.79%
YTD
19.31%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
9.75%
ALL TIME*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.18K$103.33K$101.25K
$1.14M$632.09K$360.65K

CCEF vs. DEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
6.53%13.47%17.80%
DEW
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund
19.31%22.39%12.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CCEF and DEW is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024

0.64

The correlation between CCEF and DEW shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCEF vs. DEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCEF
CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DEW
DEW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEW Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCEF vs. DEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCEFDEWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.58

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

4.77

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

19.32

-12.57

CCEF vs. DEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the DEW Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEF and DEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCEF vs. DEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum DEW drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and DEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCEFDEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-65.55%

+52.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-6.34%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.26%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-12.34%

+11.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.56%

+0.25%

Volatility

CCEF vs. DEW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) is 2.06%, while WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that CCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCEFDEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

2.21%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

7.24%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.41%

9.55%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.66%

12.90%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

15.36%

-4.70%

CCEF vs. DEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DEW's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCEF vs. DEW - Dividend Comparison

CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than DEW's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
7.36%8.08%6.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DEW
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund
3.12%3.71%4.02%4.55%3.82%3.55%4.10%3.74%4.17%3.18%3.42%4.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCEF and DEW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEW has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to CCEF (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEF dropped -13.25% vs DEW's -65.55%.

On 1-year performance, DEW leads with 30.52% vs 12.87% for CCEF. On fees, DEW is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DEW has performed better with a 30.52% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEW is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.

CCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 3.12% for DEW.

CCEF is categorized as Dividend, while DEW is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 2.74% for CCEF and 0.58% for DEW.

DEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCEF and DEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer