PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCEF vs. CPSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCEF vs. CPSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly higher than CPSP's 3.18% return.


CCEF

1D
-0.64%
1M
1.52%
YTD
5.73%
6M
6.83%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPSP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.74%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCEF vs. CPSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CCEF and CPSP is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.62

The correlation between CCEF and CPSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCEF vs. CPSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCEF
CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSP
CPSP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CPSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSP Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCEF vs. CPSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCEFCPSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.31

-0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

19.11

-17.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

96.35

-87.58

CCEF vs. CPSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the CPSP Sharpe Ratio of 5.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEF and CPSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCEFCPSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

5.08

-3.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

3.17

-1.67

Drawdowns

CCEF vs. CPSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, which is greater than CPSP's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and CPSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCEFCPSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-1.73%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-0.37%

-7.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-0.08%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

0.07%

+1.71%

Volatility

CCEF vs. CPSP - Volatility Comparison

Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) at 0.32%. This indicates that CCEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCEFCPSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

0.32%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

0.84%

+5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.94%

1.42%

+6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.78%

2.37%

+8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

2.37%

+8.41%

CCEF vs. CPSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSP's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCEF vs. CPSP - Dividend Comparison

CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, while CPSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCEF and CPSP have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCEF has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to CPSP (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEF dropped -13.25% vs CPSP's -1.73%.

On 1-year performance, CCEF leads with 15.55% vs 7.13% for CPSP. On fees, CPSP is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CCEF has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPSP is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.

CCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.98%, compared with 0.00% for CPSP.

CCEF is categorized as Dividend, while CPSP is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 2.74% for CCEF and 0.69% for CPSP.

CPSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCEF and CPSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer