CCEF vs. CBOJ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CCEF (Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF) and CBOJ (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - CCEF is a Dividend fund actively managed by Calamos, while CBOJ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index. CCEF is actively managed, while CBOJ is passively managed. Over the past year, CCEF returned 13.87% vs -4.88% for CBOJ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCEF charges 2.74%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOJ.

Performance

CCEF vs. CBOJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than CBOJ's -2.02% return.

CCEF

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 5.53%
• 6M: 5.75%
• 1Y: 13.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBOJ

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: -2.02%
• 6M: -2.12%
• 1Y: -4.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCEF vs. CBOJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	5.53%	9.20%
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-2.02%	-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CCEF and CBOJ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

CCEF vs. CBOJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCEF

CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 52
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 51

CBOJ

CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 3
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCEF vs. CBOJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCEF	CBOJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	-1.00	+2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	-1.35	+3.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.85	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	-0.59	+2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.72	-0.91	+8.63

CCEF vs. CBOJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the CBOJ Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEF and CBOJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCEF vs. CBOJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, which is greater than CBOJ's maximum drawdown of -8.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and CBOJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCEF	CBOJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.25%	-8.31%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.75%	-8.31%	+0.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-8.31%	+7.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.35%	-3.33%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	5.40%	-3.60%

Volatility

CCEF vs. CBOJ - Volatility Comparison

Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) at 0.83%. This indicates that CCEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBOJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCEF	CBOJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	0.83%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.01%	2.35%	+4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.23%	4.89%	+3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.77%	4.51%	+6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.77%	4.51%	+6.26%

CCEF vs. CBOJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCEF vs. CBOJ - Dividend Comparison

CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than CBOJ's 3.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	3.22%	3.16%	0.00%
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	8.00%	8.08%	6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCEF and CBOJ in my portfolio?

CCEF and CBOJ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCEF or CBOJ?

CCEF has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to CBOJ (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEF dropped -13.25% vs CBOJ's -8.31%.

Which ETF is better, CCEF or CBOJ?

On 1-year performance, CCEF leads with 13.87% vs -4.88% for CBOJ. On fees, CBOJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBOJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CCEF or CBOJ?

Over the 1-year period, CCEF has performed better with a 13.87% return vs -4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCEF or CBOJ?

CBOJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCEF or CBOJ?

CCEF has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 3.22% for CBOJ.

What is the main difference between CCEF and CBOJ?

CCEF is categorized as Dividend, while CBOJ is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 2.74% for CCEF and 0.69% for CBOJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.