PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCCNX vs. BGLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CCCNX vs. BGLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CCCNX vs. BGLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCCNX
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund
24.10%2.53%44.06%18.12%15.76%40.57%-35.48%8.61%-13.72%-6.47%
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.53%13.04%9.01%3.32%-5.47%16.13%-3.25%25.44%-8.06%10.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCNX achieves a 24.10% return, which is significantly higher than BGLYX's 8.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CCCNX has outperformed BGLYX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while BGLYX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.28% annualized return.


CCCNX

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.55%
YTD
24.10%
6M
23.60%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
28.41%
5Y*
24.49%
10Y*
9.62%

BGLYX

1D
0.48%
1M
-4.56%
YTD
8.53%
6M
9.80%
1Y
17.54%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
7.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CCCNX vs. BGLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCNX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than BGLYX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CCCNX vs. BGLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCCNX
CCCNX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CCCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CCCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLYX
BGLYX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BGLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCNX vs. BGLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCCNXBGLYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.52

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

2.04

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.45

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.04

9.89

-6.85

CCCNX vs. BGLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the BGLYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCCNX and BGLYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCCNXBGLYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.52

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

0.61

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.47

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.48

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between CCCNX and BGLYX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CCCNX vs. BGLYX - Dividend Comparison

CCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than BGLYX's 28.55% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCCNX
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund
4.50%5.49%5.08%5.94%5.51%7.15%15.53%12.04%11.73%9.19%9.86%8.85%
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
28.55%30.30%1.89%1.88%7.34%4.53%3.71%3.94%4.31%4.03%4.09%4.03%

Drawdowns

CCCNX vs. BGLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCNX drawdown since its inception was -75.87%, which is greater than BGLYX's maximum drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCNX and BGLYX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CCCNXBGLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.87%

-36.54%

-39.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.81%

-7.55%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.52%

-20.94%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.43%

-36.54%

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-4.56%

+3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.45%

-7.92%

-7.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.36%

1.87%

+4.49%

Volatility

CCCNX vs. BGLYX - Volatility Comparison

Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) have volatilities of 3.94% and 3.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CCCNXBGLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

3.90%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

7.35%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.32%

12.09%

+7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

13.46%

+6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.37%

15.62%

+11.75%