CBUV.DE vs. XNNV.DE
CBUV.DE (iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XNNV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUV.DE tracks the STOXX Global Metaverse while XNNV.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Innovation Select ESG Screened 200. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUV.DE returned 21.34%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for XNNV.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBUV.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XNNV.DE.
Performance
CBUV.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly lower than XNNV.DE's 5.08% return.
CBUV.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNNV.DE
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUV.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUV.DE iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.62% | 8.91% | 30.32% | 51.01% |
XNNV.DE Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | 5.08% | 2.05% | 29.19% | 23.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUV.DE and XNNV.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CBUV.DE and XNNV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUV.DE vs. XNNV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUV.DE
XNNV.DE
CBUV.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUV.DE | XNNV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.01 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 2.80 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUV.DE | XNNV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.03 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.67 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
CBUV.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, which is greater than XNNV.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and XNNV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUV.DE | XNNV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.66% | -25.90% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.30% | -15.02% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.66% | -25.90% | -1.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -0.91% | -3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -6.64% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.59% | 5.41% | +3.18% |
Volatility
CBUV.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE) at 3.84%. This indicates that CBUV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNNV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUV.DE | XNNV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 3.84% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 10.61% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 14.72% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 18.07% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 18.07% | +2.19% |
CBUV.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUV.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XNNV.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUV.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUV.DE nor XNNV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUV.DE and XNNV.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNNV.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNNV.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBUV.DE.
CBUV.DE tracks STOXX Global Metaverse, while XNNV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Innovation Select ESG Screened 200. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBUV.DE and 0.30% for XNNV.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUV.DE and XNNV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer