PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XNNV.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-9.13%2.05%29.19%29.66%-13.17%
XFNT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-14.58%-1.22%40.05%24.41%-8.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNNV.DE achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly higher than XFNT.DE's -14.58% return.


XNNV.DE

1D
2.05%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-9.13%
6M
-8.40%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
10Y*

XFNT.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
-14.58%
6M
-20.60%
1Y
-13.47%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XNNV.DE and XFNT.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Return for Risk

XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNNV.DE
XNNV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XNNV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XFNT.DE
XFNT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNNV.DEXFNT.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.08

-0.63

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

-0.76

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.90

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

-0.58

+0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.33

-1.47

+1.80

XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNNV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNNV.DE and XFNT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNNV.DEXFNT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

-0.63

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.42

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between XNNV.DE and XFNT.DE is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNNV.DE nor XFNT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNNV.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.90%, roughly equal to the maximum XFNT.DE drawdown of -26.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNNV.DE and XFNT.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XNNV.DEXFNT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.90%

-26.32%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.02%

-23.51%

+8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.46%

-24.38%

+11.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-6.96%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

9.23%

-4.32%

Volatility

XNNV.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XNNV.DEXFNT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

5.15%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

13.06%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

21.30%

-2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

19.39%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

19.39%

-1.19%