CBUN.DE vs. M37R.DE
CBUN.DE (iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and M37R.DE (HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUN.DE tracks the STOXX® Global Digital Entertainment and Education while M37R.DE tracks the Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. CBUN.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for M37R.DE.
Performance
CBUN.DE vs. M37R.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CBUN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 28.28%
- YTD
- 27.01%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 28.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.33%
M37R.DE
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CBUN.DE vs. M37R.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CBUN.DE iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -1.05% |
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | -0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUN.DE and M37R.DE is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2026 | -0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUN.DE vs. M37R.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUN.DE
M37R.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CBUN.DE vs. M37R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE) and HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBUN.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.05 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBUN.DE vs. M37R.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUN.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, which is greater than M37R.DE's maximum drawdown of -1.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUN.DE and M37R.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUN.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.59% | -1.08% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -1.08% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -0.36% | -4.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | — | — |
Volatility
CBUN.DE vs. M37R.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUN.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.30% | 15.19% | +6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 15.19% | +5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 15.19% | +5.48% |
CBUN.DE vs. M37R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUN.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than M37R.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUN.DE vs. M37R.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUN.DE nor M37R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUN.DE and M37R.DE have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUN.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUN.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for M37R.DE.
CBUN.DE tracks STOXX® Global Digital Entertainment and Education, while M37R.DE tracks Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CBUN.DE and 0.65% for M37R.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUN.DE and M37R.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer