CBUN.DE vs. ESGB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L).
CBUN.DE and ESGB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CBUN.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Global Digital Entertainment and Education. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022. ESGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2019. Both CBUN.DE and ESGB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CBUN.DE vs. ESGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CBUN.DE vs. ESGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUN.DE iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -5.49% | 9.37% | 36.98% | 46.88% | -9.11% |
ESGB.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD | -12.11% | 12.43% | 58.35% | 28.59% | -16.12% |
Different Trading Currencies
CBUN.DE is traded in EUR, while ESGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESGB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUN.DE achieves a -5.49% return, which is significantly higher than ESGB.L's -12.11% return.
CBUN.DE
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -5.49%
- 6M
- -11.93%
- 1Y
- 7.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB.L
- 1D
- -25.31%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- -12.11%
- 6M
- -23.80%
- 1Y
- -2.99%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CBUN.DE vs. ESGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUN.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGB.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CBUN.DE vs. ESGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBUN.DE
ESGB.L
CBUN.DE vs. ESGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUN.DE | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | -0.06 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 0.27 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.06 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 0.11 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.76 | 0.25 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUN.DE | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | -0.06 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.60 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUN.DE and ESGB.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CBUN.DE vs. ESGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUN.DE nor ESGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CBUN.DE vs. ESGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUN.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, smaller than the maximum ESGB.L drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUN.DE and ESGB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUN.DE | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.59% | -39.40% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | -26.63% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.95% | -25.28% | +10.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -12.80% | +7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 11.15% | -3.49% |
Volatility
CBUN.DE vs. ESGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE) is 6.01%, while VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) has a volatility of 43.32%. This indicates that CBUN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CBUN.DE | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 43.32% | -37.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 43.98% | -29.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 47.56% | -25.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 29.79% | -9.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 28.78% | -8.56% |